Tuesday , July 17 2018
Home / Cafe Hayek / Quotation of the Day…

Quotation of the Day…

Summary:
… is from page 226 of Douglas Irwin’s superb 1996 book, Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade: Consequently, despite the abundant and repeated criticisms that have been made about the theoretical case for free trade, the broad presumption behind free trade has not been substantially undercut, but has remained intact. DBx: Indeed so. And Doug’s point is no less true in 2018 than it was when he published these words in 1996. The reason is not difficult to find: free trade is a policy of rejecting government creation of artificially high degrees of scarcity. Free trade is a policy based on the recognition that more goods and services available in a country’s markets means, on the whole, more goods and services available for the people of that country to consume.

Topics:
Don Boudreaux considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Don Boudreaux writes Bonus Quotation of the Day…

Mark Perry writes Protectionism as errant economic quackery that deserves contempt, scorn, ridicule and moral indignation – Publications – AEI

Mark Perry writes In practice, ‘fair trade’ = protectionism – Publications – AEI

Wolf Richter writes This “Trade War is a Different Ballgame”

… is from page 226 of Douglas Irwin’s superb 1996 book, Against the Tide: An Intellectual History of Free Trade:

Quotation of the Day…Consequently, despite the abundant and repeated criticisms that have been made about the theoretical case for free trade, the broad presumption behind free trade has not been substantially undercut, but has remained intact.

DBx: Indeed so. And Doug’s point is no less true in 2018 than it was when he published these words in 1996. The reason is not difficult to find: free trade is a policy of rejecting government creation of artificially high degrees of scarcity. Free trade is a policy based on the recognition that more goods and services available in a country’s markets means, on the whole, more goods and services available for the people of that country to consume. Protectionists peddle the opposite conclusion – and, I admit, I don’t envy the task that they set for themselves – namely, that a government’s creation of artificially high degrees of scarcity make the people of that country richer rather than poorer. Protectionists anticipated Orwell by centuries, because for protectionists, less is more and more is less.

Comments

Don Boudreaux
He is a professor of economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Virginia. Previously, he was president of the Foundation for Economic Education.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *