Friday , January 17 2020
Home / Cato Liberty / Absent Further Review, the Spending Stands as Called

Absent Further Review, the Spending Stands as Called

Summary:
In a new Washington Post op-ed, University of Virginia Curry School of Education dean Robert Pianta offers an assertion that is shocking, at least if you follow education policy: “public funding for schools has actually decreased since the late 1980s, adjusting for constant dollars.” It is shocking because federal, inflation-adjusted data show nothing even close to that, as you can see in the chart below. This spending data is well-known among wonks, and while it is open to some interpretation, I can find nothing supporting Pianta’s claim. His piece includes a link to a U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report, but I found nothing in it backing up his assertion. Bruce Baker of Rutgers, who is a supporter of Pianta’s argument that spending more on education would make a big difference, has

Topics:
Neal McCluskey considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Don Boudreaux writes Quotation of the Day…

Joseph Mercola writes Opioid Crisis — A Result of Poverty, Availability, and Pain

No Author writes Trump Steps Back From the Edge. Neocons Rage Accordingly

No Author writes Burnout Linked to Atrial Fibrillation and Irregular Heartbeat

In a new Washington Post op-ed, University of Virginia Curry School of Education dean Robert Pianta offers an assertion that is shocking, at least if you follow education policy: “public funding for schools has actually decreased since the late 1980s, adjusting for constant dollars.” It is shocking because federal, inflation-adjusted data show nothing even close to that, as you can see in the chart below.

Absent Further Review, the Spending Stands as Called

This spending data is well-known among wonks, and while it is open to some interpretation, I can find nothing supporting Pianta’s claim. His piece includes a link to a U.S. Commission on Civil Rights report, but I found nothing in it backing up his assertion. Bruce Baker of Rutgers, who is a supporter of Pianta’s argument that spending more on education would make a big difference, has also failed to see the basis for his claim.

Of course, it is possible I am missing something, and I hope Pianta will clarify the assertion. But until he does, the play stands as called: inflation-adjusted K-12 spending has risen substantially since the 1980s.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *