After discussing a ten-year-old paper on empirical philosophy of mind, Robin proposes a remarkable bet:I'm also pretty sure that while the "robot" in the study was rated low on experience, that was because it was rated low on capacities like for pain, pleasure, rage, desire, and personality. Ems, being more articulate and expressive than most humans, could quickly convince most biological humans that they act very much like creatures with such capacities. You might claim that humans will all insist on rating anything not made of biochemicals as all very low on all such capacities, but that is not what we see in the above survey, nor what we see in how people react to fictional robot characters,
Bryan Caplan considers the following as important: Behavioral Economics and Rationality
This could be interesting, too:
Bryan Caplan writes War Crimes and the Long Run
Bryan Caplan writes What’s in Your Bag?
Bryan Caplan writes Stop Thinking Like a Tourist: Macaulay Edition
Bryan Caplan writes How Conscious Is Your Robot?