In an article in which he makes a number of good points, on net defending a baker's decision not to bake a cake for a celebration that the baker objects to on religious grounds, Andrew Sullivan writes:And it is a hard case constitutionally. It pits religious and artistic freedom against civil equality and nondiscrimination. Anyone on either side who claims this is an easy call are [sic] fanatics of one kind or other.I think laws against discrimination are wrong, based on my belief in freedom of association. I've written about that many times on EconLog and so I won't repeat the arguments here. I'll simply cite a post in which I took on Michael Munger's opposition to freedom of association. So Sullivan
David Henderson considers the following as important: liberty
This could be interesting, too:
Contributing Guest writes Not Enough Women at Wikipedia?
David Henderson writes Who Has a Right to Your Body?
Steve Horwitz writes Promoting Liberty or Provoking the Left?
David Henderson writes Caligula’s Wish