Sunday , December 17 2017
Home / EconLog Library / The Inverse-Hirschman Scenario

The Inverse-Hirschman Scenario

Summary:
I call attention to the Inverse-Hirschman scenario's twist for a specific historical reason. It basically describes another historical situation--this one in Charlottesville, Virginia in the spring of 1959, amidst ongoing court orders to desegregate. The Charlottesville school system's attorney at the time was John S. Battle, Jr.--a committed segregationist politician and son of a former Virginia governor with close ties to the political machine of Senator Harry Flood Byrd, Sr. Virginia's legislature was debating the adoption of a tuition grant program that had some characteristics of a rudimentary voucher system. Although ostensibly race-neutral, these tuition grants could be used to send white

Topics:
David Henderson considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

David Henderson writes Why Do College Admissions Offices Value Volunteer Work?

Bryan Caplan writes From the Cutting Room Floor: The Case Against Education

Bryan Caplan writes Commentary on Captain Fantastic

Bryan Caplan writes The Science of Homeschooling

The Inverse-Hirschman Scenario

I call attention to the Inverse-Hirschman scenario's twist for a specific historical reason. It basically describes another historical situation--this one in Charlottesville, Virginia in the spring of 1959, amidst ongoing court orders to desegregate.

The Charlottesville school system's attorney at the time was John S. Battle, Jr.--a committed segregationist politician and son of a former Virginia governor with close ties to the political machine of Senator Harry Flood Byrd, Sr. Virginia's legislature was debating the adoption of a tuition grant program that had some characteristics of a rudimentary voucher system. Although ostensibly race-neutral, these tuition grants could be used to send white children to "segregation academies" in place of the public school. This proposal is what modern voucher opponents use to link vouchers and segregation.

Not all segregationists supported the tuition grants, though, and one of their vocal opponents was none other than John S. Battle, Jr. Speaking at a Charlottesville PTA meeting on March 23, 1959, Battle denounced the program and implored white parents to exercise solidarity by registering their children in the public schools. His rationale was simple. By keeping segregationist parents around as a social buffer against integration, the white-controlled public school system could limit the admission of black students to only a few families, despite the court orders to integrate. They would do so by keeping white-majority schools at constant full capacity, leaving no space for more black students.


This is from Phillip W. Magness, "School Vouchers and the Inverse-Hirschman Scenario," Econlib Feature Article, December 4, 2017.

I highly recommend this article.



David Henderson

David Henderson is a British economist. He was the Head of the Economics and Statistics Department at the OECD in 1984–1992. Before that he worked as an academic economist in Britain, first at Oxford (Fellow of Lincoln College) and later at University College London (Professor of Economics, 1975–1983); as a British civil servant (first as an Economic Advisor in HM Treasury, and later as Chief Economist in the Ministry of Aviation); and as a staff member of the World Bank (1969–1975). In 1985 he gave the BBC Reith Lectures, which were published in the book Innocence and Design: The Influence of Economic Ideas on Policy (Blackwell, 1986).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *