Monday , October 23 2017
Home / EconLog Library / Rajan on inequalities and the rise of populism

Rajan on inequalities and the rise of populism

Summary:
Raghuram Rajan recently gave a speech in Chicago on inequalities. Unfortunately the text is not available on line, but at "Pro Market" we can find a synthesis. Though most of it is hardly original, it seems to me that Rajan has framed the issue in a more interesting way than most. I find it particularly interesting that he adds a horizontal dimension to inequality, "urban centers and more rural areas that have been deeply affected by trade". This brings us back to the longstanding contrast between cities and the countryside, with innovation being concentrated in the first. This also helps Rajan in giving his policy prescriptions sort of a federalist touch, arguing against more centralization in decision

Topics:
Alberto Mingardi considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Scott Sumner writes Are most Americans radical libertarians?

Scott Sumner writes The economic news is not good

Alberto Mingardi writes The tragedy of Grenfell Tower and some Internet demagogues

Scott Sumner writes Does tribalism breed extremism?

Raghuram Rajan recently gave a speech in Chicago on inequalities. Unfortunately the text is not available on line, but at "Pro Market" we can find a synthesis. Though most of it is hardly original, it seems to me that Rajan has framed the issue in a more interesting way than most.
Rajan on inequalities and the rise of populism

I find it particularly interesting that he adds a horizontal dimension to inequality, "urban centers and more rural areas that have been deeply affected by trade". This brings us back to the longstanding contrast between cities and the countryside, with innovation being concentrated in the first. This also helps Rajan in giving his policy prescriptions sort of a federalist touch, arguing against more centralization in decision making.

I am less convinced by his main point, though. That is: populism breeds crony capitalism. Certainly nationalism has been the ideological justification of protectionism, and that's not news. But as Rajan notes, people are angry at markets because of the financial crisis, which has been understood as evidence of the corruption of the financial elites. Wasn't that crony capitalism, too?

Rajan's point may be that people are confusing the medicine with the illness, but it doesn't come out like that from the blogpost.



Alberto Mingardi
Mingardi, one of the rising stars of European libertarianism, is the founder and Director General of the Italian free-market think tank, Instituto Bruno Leoni. His areas of interest include the history of economic thought and antitrust and healthcare systems. He is particularly well known for popularizing the work of past scholars under-appreciated by today’s libertarians. Currently an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, Mingardi has also worked with the Heritage Foundation, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, the Acton Institute, and the Centre for a New Europe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *