Last week I attended the Cato Monetary conference in Washington. Jim Dorn always does a good job of finding interesting speakers. I couldn't help contrasting the event with the Peterson Institute conference that I attended last month. At the Peterson Institute, most speakers correctly noted that insufficient AD was a key problem over the past decade, but also argued (wrongly, in my view) that monetary stimulus was relatively ineffective at the zero bound. At Cato it was almost the exact opposite. I don't recall anyone doubting the effectiveness of monetary policy (I attended 3 of the 4 panels), but there was almost no concern about insufficient nominal spending. Indeed a number of speakers seemed
Scott Sumner considers the following as important: Money
This could be interesting, too:
SchiffGold writes Bitcoin’s Tumble
Scott Sumner writes Should central banks become banks?
Keith Weiner writes Something for Nothing, Report 20 May 2018
Robert Murphy writes Hayek and the Regression Theorem