Sunday , December 9 2018
Home / EconLog Library / Italy vs the EU (again)

Italy vs the EU (again)

Summary:
Italy is in a stalemate with the European Commission on its budget law, with the new “populist” government trying to twist the arm of the Commission. Yet the two parties that support the government, the Northern League and the Five Stars Movement, seem to be thinking mostly in terms of the upcoming (May 2019) European elections. They want to increase their consensus as defenders of national sovereignty against the all powerful Brussels. On Politico I try to explain why I find this to be a bizarre blend of nationalism: one that tries to commandeer to other nations’ purses, instead of building national confidence up. A few days ago Luigi Zingales had an op-ed in the New York Times in which he argued for an armed truce so to say, between Rome and Brussels. In his

Topics:
Alberto Mingardi considers the following as important: , , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Pierre Lemieux writes Consumer Sovereignty: A Response to Greg Autry

Scott Sumner writes The politics of budget deficits

Scott Sumner writes How should we think about Russian meddling in the 2016 election?

Pierre Lemieux writes Liberty, Authority, and Giuliani

Italy is in a stalemate with the European Commission on its budget law, with the new “populist” government trying to twist the arm of the Commission. Yet the two parties that support the government, the Northern League and the Five Stars Movement, seem to be thinking mostly in terms of the upcoming (May 2019) European elections. They want to increase their consensus as defenders of national sovereignty against the all powerful Brussels. On Politico I try to explain why I find this to be a bizarre blend of nationalism: one that tries to commandeer to other nations’ purses, instead of building national confidence up.

A few days ago Luigi Zingales had an op-ed in the New York Times in which he argued for an armed truce so to say, between Rome and Brussels. In his piece, he reminds us that “one of the lessons we learned from 1930s Germany is what happens when an intransigent group of nations tries to humiliate a prostrated borrower country for petty national politics”. These are wise words: yet one wonders how they do apply to today’s Europe.

Since 2016, the ECB has so far bought 2.5 trillion euros worth of the debt of member countries’ debt. When it comes to Italy—as a consequence of its bond-buying programme—the ECB now owns 18% of Italy’s government debt on its balance sheet. By doing this and more generally by resorting to non conventional monetary policies, the European Central Bank has helped to keep the cost of financing the Italian debt low, certainly lower than it would have otherwise been.

On the other hand Zingales points out that most of Italy’s problems are of her own making. When it comes to reforms to foster growth, reduce government spending, open markets up, Italy did very little since 2016. Yet its new government desires no reforms of this kind and its ministers day-dream of new nationalisations.

Alberto Mingardi
Mingardi, one of the rising stars of European libertarianism, is the founder and Director General of the Italian free-market think tank, Instituto Bruno Leoni. His areas of interest include the history of economic thought and antitrust and healthcare systems. He is particularly well known for popularizing the work of past scholars under-appreciated by today’s libertarians. Currently an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, Mingardi has also worked with the Heritage Foundation, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, the Acton Institute, and the Centre for a New Europe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *