The New York Times recently published a very strange story on New Jersey, discussing the Garden State's ban on self-service gasoline. The article discussed a recent proposal to lift the ban (all other states allow self-service), as well as local opposition to ending the ban. So what makes the article so strange? It turns out that none of the information in the article has any bearing at all on the policy issue being considered. The author (Jonah Engel Bromwich) wrote the article as if the proposed policy was a complete ban on full service gas pumps. Here's a typical example: [T]he university found that 63 percent of voters supported the law [banning self service] and only 23 percent opposed it, with
Scott Sumner considers the following as important: liberty
This could be interesting, too:
Fernando Teson writes Socialism: What’s in a Word?
Christopher Freiman writes Why Are Some Libertarians So Conservative About Immigration?
Scott Sumner writes Good and bad pardons