by Tyler Cowen posted a response to my critiques of his articles this morning. Unlike Tyler, I will do him the courtesy of linking to his post. Someone named David Henderson responded. If you know me, you know that that’s not me. That’s not my style at all. I did post two comments on Cowen’s post, under my name David R. Henderson, the one I always use to post comments and the one I always use in my articles. I didn’t address the merits of Cowen’s case. I simply posted to let him and his readers know, assuming his readers care (I think Tyler does), that I am not the David Henderson who commented. Update: Tyler Cowen offered to delete the “David Henderson” comments and I thanked him.
Topics:
David Henderson considers the following as important: Uncategorized
This could be interesting, too:
Scott Sumner writes Biden approves First Dose First!
Keith Weiner writes Reflections Over 2020
Scott Sumner writes Gold hoarding during the Great Depression
Alberto Mingardi writes Michael Oakeshott: A Hero for Whom?
Tyler Cowen posted a response to my critiques of his articles this morning. Unlike Tyler, I will do him the courtesy of linking to his post.
Someone named David Henderson responded. If you know me, you know that that’s not me. That’s not my style at all.
I did post two comments on Cowen’s post, under my name David R. Henderson, the one I always use to post comments and the one I always use in my articles. I didn’t address the merits of Cowen’s case. I simply posted to let him and his readers know, assuming his readers care (I think Tyler does), that I am not the David Henderson who commented.
Update: Tyler Cowen offered to delete the “David Henderson” comments and I thanked him.