Tuesday , September 29 2020
Home / Alberto Mingardi /The chair and its enemies

The chair and its enemies

Summary:
This article won’t come as a surprise to those, among our readers, that are partisans of standing desks (quite a few of them, I suppose, in the US, not so many in Europe). This piece by Sara Hendren, abstracted from her book What Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World, presents interesting arguments against the chair. “Sitting for hours and hours can weaken your back and core muscles, pinch the nerves of your rear end and constrain the flow of blood that your body needs for peak energy and attention. Most people’s bodies are largely unsuited to extended periods in these structures”. If the chair is an old invention, the widespread use of it is a rather new thing, “for most of human history, a mix of postures was the norm for a body meeting the world”. In

Topics:
Alberto Mingardi considers the following as important: , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

Alberto Mingardi writes Enriques on Friedman

Jayme Lemke writes RBG and the “Waypavers”

Pierre Lemieux writes Is Modern Democracy So Modern and How?

David Henderson writes Raghuran Rajan’s The Third Pillar

The chair and its enemies

This article won’t come as a surprise to those, among our readers, that are partisans of standing desks (quite a few of them, I suppose, in the US, not so many in Europe). This piece by Sara Hendren, abstracted from her book What Can a Body Do? How We Meet the Built World, presents interesting arguments against the chair. “Sitting for hours and hours can weaken your back and core muscles, pinch the nerves of your rear end and constrain the flow of blood that your body needs for peak energy and attention. Most people’s bodies are largely unsuited to extended periods in these structures”. If the chair is an old invention, the widespread use of it is a rather new thing, “for most of human history, a mix of postures was the norm for a body meeting the world”.

In part the article stresses the fact that a “chair-and-table culture” is actually a recent thing, basically a byproduct of our industrial society with its factory and its office, and thus our body has difficulties to cope with it.

In part the article builds on Victor Papanek’s polemic against industrial design and the search for design virtuosism, rather than comfort, and the emergence of “universal design”.

The conflict between beautiful and convenient is older than contemporary design, which seems to me has solved it better than most. Anyway, fascinating.

Alberto Mingardi
Mingardi, one of the rising stars of European libertarianism, is the founder and Director General of the Italian free-market think tank, Instituto Bruno Leoni. His areas of interest include the history of economic thought and antitrust and healthcare systems. He is particularly well known for popularizing the work of past scholars under-appreciated by today’s libertarians. Currently an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, Mingardi has also worked with the Heritage Foundation, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, the Acton Institute, and the Centre for a New Europe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *