Monday , June 21 2021
Home / David Henderson /Jason Furman on High UI

Jason Furman on High UI

Summary:
Furman argued that the 0 a week in extra jobless benefits that was also provided by the plan was holding back a jobs recovery in some places. Furman said of the overall package, “It’s definitely too big for the moment. I don’t know any economist that was recommending something the size of what was done.” Furman aligned with some Republican-run states, including Montana and North Dakota, that have suspended the 0 a week supplemental unemployment insurance, or UI, payments in the aim of spurring hiring. “If I were in a state with a 3.5% unemployment rate, I’d be thinking seriously about whether paying people more to not work than to work was a good thing to continue doing,” Furman said. While it depends on the location, state of the pandemic, and economic

Topics:
David Henderson considers the following as important: , , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

David Henderson writes A Warm Memory about State Farm’s Good Will

David Henderson writes How the Profit Motive Makes Discrimination Less than Otherwise

David Henderson writes Failure to Launch and UBI

Walter Block writes Do Labor Unions Really Raise Wages?

Furman argued that the $300 a week in extra jobless benefits that was also provided by the plan was holding back a jobs recovery in some places. Furman said of the overall package, “It’s definitely too big for the moment. I don’t know any economist that was recommending something the size of what was done.”

Furman aligned with some Republican-run states, including Montana and North Dakota, that have suspended the $300 a week supplemental unemployment insurance, or UI, payments in the aim of spurring hiring.

“If I were in a state with a 3.5% unemployment rate, I’d be thinking seriously about whether paying people more to not work than to work was a good thing to continue doing,” Furman said. While it depends on the location, state of the pandemic, and economic condition, “certainly by June, July, August of this year I don’t think we need the same UI system that we had in January.”

This is from Nancy Cook, “Obama, Biden Economists in Conflict on Inflation Jump, Spending,” Bloomberg, May 12, 2021.

This is what many economists, including Scott Sumner and me, have been saying for months. I think Jason is wrong, though, about these benefits being a good idea in January.

David Henderson
David R. Henderson (born November 21, 1950) is a Canadian-born American economist and author who moved to the United States in 1972 and became a U.S. citizen in 1986, serving on President Ronald Reagan's Council of Economic Advisers from 1982 to 1984.[1] A research fellow at Stanford University's Hoover Institution[2] since 1990, he took a teaching position with the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California in 1984, and is now a full professor of economics.[3]

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *