Sunday , December 5 2021
Home / Alberto Mingardi /The Madrid Model and the Pandemic

The Madrid Model and the Pandemic

Summary:
In the City Journal, I have a short piece on the “Madrid model” in managing the pandemic. The region of Madrid has been quite exceptional because, during the second wave, it kept activities relatively more open than elsewhere in Europe. It did so not so much by taking a “wait and see” approach, which is what others tend to criticize and fear whenever a more libertarian minded take on the pandemic is hinted to, but by proactively hunting the virus, particularly through a system of wastewater screening to identify the hotspots of the infection. The local government bounded itself to a clear policy goal: keeping the region as open as possible. In order to meet this goal, it perhaps did more in terms confronting the virus, than those who chose to flatten the curve by

Topics:
Alberto Mingardi considers the following as important: , , , , ,

This could be interesting, too:

SchiffGold writes Peter Schiff: It Was a Black and Blue Friday

David Henderson writes No Single Incident of Anticompetitive Actions

Thomas Firey writes COVID and the Data of Death

David Henderson writes Surviving the Zam Zam

In the City Journal, I have a short piece on the “Madrid model” in managing the pandemic. The region of Madrid has been quite exceptional because, during the second wave, it kept activities relatively more open than elsewhere in Europe. It did so not so much by taking a “wait and see” approach, which is what others tend to criticize and fear whenever a more libertarian minded take on the pandemic is hinted to, but by proactively hunting the virus, particularly through a system of wastewater screening to identify the hotspots of the infection. The local government bounded itself to a clear policy goal: keeping the region as open as possible. In order to meet this goal, it perhaps did more in terms confronting the virus, than those who chose to flatten the curve by locking down.

At the very beginning of the piece, I write:

The Covid-19 pandemic heralded for many, particularly in Europe, the “return of the state.” Nation-states were supposedly the natural and proper level for pandemic policymaking, as they supplied most of the subsidies keeping economic activity afloat during lockdowns. Early on, the most intense debates concerned which national response was best: the Italian model, the closest thing to a Chinese lockdown that a liberal democracy could manage; or the Swedish model, an almost laissez-faire approach. Few paid attention to how cities and regional governments responded. In Spain, however, it’s at the regional level that the pandemic’s most interesting and useful lessons may be found.

This is probably true elsewhere too. We spent a lot of time arguing over different “national” models, but there were nuances, and slowing contagion down was ultimately up to local government institutions. Perhaps in the next few years we will have more studies of how regions and cities actually coped with these challenges, and less on supposedly national approaches. In the US of course this is more apparent than in Europa.

Alberto Mingardi
Mingardi, one of the rising stars of European libertarianism, is the founder and Director General of the Italian free-market think tank, Instituto Bruno Leoni. His areas of interest include the history of economic thought and antitrust and healthcare systems. He is particularly well known for popularizing the work of past scholars under-appreciated by today’s libertarians. Currently an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute, Mingardi has also worked with the Heritage Foundation, the Atlas Economic Research Foundation, the Acton Institute, and the Centre for a New Europe.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *