Monday , September 21 2020
Home / Mises Institute /3 Charts Showing Just How Boxed in the Fed Is

3 Charts Showing Just How Boxed in the Fed Is

Summary:
By: Robert P. Murphy The Fed met market expectations by cutting its target for the fed funds rate by 25 basis points, down to the range of 1.75 – 2.00 percent. In this post I want to demonstrate just how boxed in the Fed has now become, with the help of 3 charts. First, let’s review just how low interest rates have been (and still are), in a long-term historical context: As the chart shows, the (effective) fed funds rate was in this range back during the early 2000s, which helped spawn the housing bubble and bust (as I predicted in this Mises.org article which ran 11 months before the financial crisis). Before then, we have to go all the way back to the early 1960s to see rates this low. And furthermore, to the extent that Mises was right, and artificially low interest rates lead to

Topics:
Mises Institute considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Mises Institute writes The Origins of the 2 Percent Inflation Target

Alasdair Macleod writes China is killing the dollar

Frank Holmes writes The Urban-to-Suburban Exodus May Be the Biggest in 50 Years

Mises Institute writes The Gender Feminist–New Left–Marxist Axis Attacks All Civil Society

By: Robert P. Murphy

The Fed met market expectations by cutting its target for the fed funds rate by 25 basis points, down to the range of 1.75 – 2.00 percent. In this post I want to demonstrate just how boxed in the Fed has now become, with the help of 3 charts.

First, let’s review just how low interest rates have been (and still are), in a long-term historical context:

3 Charts Showing Just How Boxed in the Fed Is

As the chart shows, the (effective) fed funds rate was in this range back during the early 2000s, which helped spawn the housing bubble and bust (as I predicted in this Mises.org article which ran 11 months before the financial crisis). Before then, we have to go all the way back to the early 1960s to see rates this low. And furthermore, to the extent that Mises was right, and artificially low interest rates lead to an unsustainble boom, then the seven years of virtually zero percent interest rates (from December 2008 – December 2015) have fostered a plethora of malinvestments.

Now here’s the irony: In the midst of the Fed cutting rates, and injecting $75 billion in repo operations on Tuesday to push down a spike in short-term rates, at least on paper we see that everything seems to be fine. Specifically, consumer price inflation is a bit lower than the Fed’s desired level but is still at a “healthy” 1.8% (year over year, as of August), while the official unemployment rate is still at a 50-year low:

3 Charts Showing Just How Boxed in the Fed Is

Finally, despite the apparently healthy economy (vis-a-vis the Fed’s “dual mandate”), there is still an extraordinary stockpile of excess reserves in the banking system, relative to the pre-crisis era:

3 Charts Showing Just How Boxed in the Fed Is

Medical metaphors for economics are never perfect, but we can certainly say this: Far from being in the midst of a robust “recovery,” the patient–i.e. the US economy–is still incredibly weak, needing constant infusions of medicine to stave off a crisis in its circulation.

On the one hand, it’s refreshing that Fed officials don’t think the economy can be summed up in two numbers, namely the official unemployment and consumer price inflation rates. But on the other hand, the fact that the Fed is cutting rates now, in spite of the “healthy numbers,” is an ominous indication of just how deep the rot goes in the economy’s capital structure.

Unfortunately, the world may soon see exactly why 7 years of unprecedently loose monetary policy was a very foolish idea.

Powered by WPeMatico

Mises Institute
The Mises Institute, founded in 1982, teaches the scholarship of Austrian economics, freedom, and peace. The liberal intellectual tradition of Ludwig von Mises (1881-1973) and Murray N. Rothbard (1926-1995) guides us. Accordingly, we seek a profound and radical shift in the intellectual climate: away from statism and toward a private property order.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *