Monday , October 23 2017
Home / LewRockwell / Time for a Flu Vaccine?

Time for a Flu Vaccine?

Summary:
The flu and cold season is upon us.  I have already seen numerous patients suffering from upper respiratory illnesses and even weathered my first bout. The CDC and the Powers-That-Be would have you believe that you should receive the influenza vaccine on a yearly basis. (1) They claim that the flu vaccine can save thousands of lives.  Of course, I have written to you many times that there is not a single study that has ever supported the claim that the flu vaccine saves any lives.  In fact, the history of the flu vaccine shows clearly that it fails nearly all who take it. A recent article in Family Practice News (September 1, 2017, p. 10) was titled, “Inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine safe, effective.”  The article states, “An

Topics:
Dr. David Brownstein considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Don Boudreaux writes Quotation of the Day…

Tim Worstall writes It’s amusing what people don’t grasp about inequality

Wolf Richter writes Wall Street Piles into Cryptocurrencies, Others Speak of “Biggest Scam Ever”

Joseph Mercola writes Does Illness Have an Odor?

The flu and cold season is upon us.  I have already seen numerous patients suffering from upper respiratory illnesses and even weathered my first bout.

The CDC and the Powers-That-Be would have you believe that you should receive the influenza vaccine on a yearly basis. (1) They claim that the flu vaccine can save thousands of lives.  Of course, I have written to you many times that there is not a single study that has ever supported the claim that the flu vaccine saves any lives.  In fact, the history of the flu vaccine shows clearly that it fails nearly all who take it.

A recent article in Family Practice News (September 1, 2017, p. 10) was titled, “Inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine safe, effective.”  The article states, “An intramuscular inactivated quadrivalent influenza vaccine reduced the risk of laboratory-confirmed influenza by up to 69% in previously unvaccinated children aged 6-35 months in a large randomized trial, reported at the annual meeting of the European Society for Paediatric (sic) Infectious Diseases.”

Wow. I have studied the influenza vaccine for years and I know that there is not one study that has shown the flu vaccine very effective for preventing the flu.  Is this something new?

I pulled the study and read it. Here’s what I found.

Instant Access to Current Spot Prices & Interactive Charts

The study included 5,806 healthy 6-35-months-old.  More than 5,400 were randomized to two doses of the quadrivalent vaccine (Fluzone) or placebo.  The trial was conducted in Europe, Asia, South America and Africa between March 2014 and September 2016.  The incidence of any laboratory-confirmed strain of influenza illness during the period from 14 days post-vaccination to the end of the flu season was 1.01% in the Fluzone group and 3.28% in those who received the placebo.

How did they get the 69% efficacy rate?  They used the relative risk statistical analysis by simply dividing 1.01 into 3.28.  When I lecture to health care professionals about statistics, I tell them that the relative risk analysis is used by the Big Pharma Cartel to make a poorly performing drug or therapy look better than it actually is.   Relative risk analysis should never be used when making clinical decisions about whether to prescribe a drug or therapy.  Sadly, most doctors and other healthcare professionals have no knowledge about how to properly review a medical study because they do not understand statistics.

Read the Whole Article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *