Friday , April 19 2019
Home / LewRockwell / Blind Faith vs. the Bottom Line

Blind Faith vs. the Bottom Line

Summary:
There is more than a little “let them eat brioche” in the blind faith that the masses’ patience for pillage is infinite. We’ve reached an interesting moment in history where we each have a simple choice: we either go with blind faith or we go with the bottom line, i.e. the facts of the matter. So far, 2019 is the year of Blind Faith, as the charts below illustrate: the bottom line no longer matters. Let’s start with the Ray Dalio Effect, which strikes financiers who’ve exploited our rigged system to skim billions while creating zero goods and services or public good: discerning that the millions whose labor has created the actual goods, services and public good will eventually tear down his Bastille of ill-gotten wealth stone by

Topics:
Charles Hugh Smith considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

José Niño writes Will Conservatives See the Light on Secession?

Ryan McMaken writes Bernie Tells America: Pull Yourself up by Your Bootstraps!

Chris Calton writes “A Glittering Lie” — The True Battle of Shiloh

William L. Anderson writes Krugman Needs a Lesson on Why Truckers Are Paid Less Now than in the 1970s

There is more than a little “let them eat brioche” in the blind faith that the masses’ patience for pillage is infinite.

We’ve reached an interesting moment in history where we each have a simple choice: we either go with blind faith or we go with the bottom line, i.e. the facts of the matter. So far, 2019 is the year of Blind Faith, as the charts below illustrate: the bottom line no longer matters.

Let’s start with the Ray Dalio Effect, which strikes financiers who’ve exploited our rigged system to skim billions while creating zero goods and services or public good: discerning that the millions whose labor has created the actual goods, services and public good will eventually tear down his Bastille of ill-gotten wealth stone by stone, Mr. Dalio rigs a corporate media appearance (the door is always open to billionaire financiers) to weep alligator tears while decrying the very system he exploited and suggesting we throw a few more crumbs to the mob to distract them from the awareness that his billions were ultimately skimmed from the wealth they generated.

Nice timing, Mr. Dalio: It’s awfully convenient of you to decry the system you helped create after you’ve skimmed your ill-gotten billions rather then before.

Then there’s the blind faith that nose-bleed stock valuations can only go higher. Courtesy of The era of ‘price-insensitive buying’ has led to this troubling chart(MarketWatch), here’s a chart of the valuation of the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI), which now exceeds the insane extremes of the dot-com bubble circa 1999-2000.

Blind Faith vs. the Bottom Line

Blind faith was the punter’s choice in late 1999-early 2000 as well. The bottom line no longer mattered.

In another victory of blind faith over the bottom line, IPOs with negative earnings have reached the profits-don’t-matter craziness of the dot-com bubble: but blind faith assures us that this time it’s different and this is not a bubble.Rewarding Reckless Risk Pricing… Again! (Zero Hedge)

Blind Faith vs. the Bottom Line

Then there’s the little spot of bother with everyone’s favorite object of blind faith, Apple: iPhone sales have flatlined even as Apple slashes prices in weakening markets.

Charles Hugh Smith
Charles Hugh Smith is an American writer and blogger. He is the chief writer for the site "Of Two Minds". Started in 2005, this site has been listed No. 7 in CNBC's top alternative financial sites. His commentary is featured on a number of sites including: Zerohedge.com., The American Conservative and Peak Prosperity. He graduated from the University of Hawaii, Manoa in Honolulu. Charles Hugh Smith currently resides in Berkeley, California and Hilo, Hawaii.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *