Tuesday , March 19 2019
Home / LewRockwell / A License To Kill

A License To Kill

Summary:
Imagine being empowered by the state to threaten people with murderous violence over hurt feelings. Or for pretty much any reason at all. Without having to worry much – if at all – about ever being held criminally responsible for such abuse. To say that such a policy is dangerous is like saying there’s a slight problem in the Titanic’s hold, after it hit the iceberg. It is catastrophic – as great a threat to our liberties as the gushing-in seawater was to the souls aboard the doomed liner. In this video, a man who flipped The Bird to an armed government worker finds himself in mortal peril because he hurt the AGW’s feelings. Not because any law was broken – much less any harm done to persons or property, the only moral

Topics:
Eric Peters considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Wolf Richter writes Home Prices in Sydney & Melbourne Spiral Down, Bust Spreads. IMF to Regulators: “Reinforce Financial Crisis Management”

Front page feed writes Why Capitalism is the Answer to Environmental Concerns About “Overpopulation”

Per Bylund writes Ludwig von Mises on the Difference Between Entrepreneurs and Managers

Michel Accad, Anish Koka writes 66. Cardiology Health Policy: The Clinicians Strike Back

Imagine being empowered by the state to threaten people with murderous violence over hurt feelings.

Or for pretty much any reason at all. Without having to worry much – if at all – about ever being held criminally responsible for such abuse.

To say that such a policy is dangerous is like saying there’s a slight problem in the Titanic’s hold, after it hit the iceberg.

It is catastrophic – as great a threat to our liberties as the gushing-in seawater was to the souls aboard the doomed liner.

In this video, a man who flipped The Bird to an armed government worker finds himself in mortal peril because he hurt the AGW’s feelings. Not because any law was broken – much less any harm done to persons or property, the only moral justification for interfering with anyone’s liberty.

Nonetheless, the affronted AGW uses his government-issued car and his government-issued gun and the government-sanctioned threat of murderous violence to coerce compliance to “pull over” – a soft-sounding euphemism (like the “shared responsibility payment” under Obamacare) for something as hard as it gets: A government thug waylaying a peaceful human being, using all the just-enumerated threats, overt and implied, that he will be killed (ultimately) if he does not obey.

Some reading this will be taken aback at the language above – will consider the foregoing a hyperbolic statement. But it is a statement of fact. Had the man – who did nothing illegal – declined to obey the illegal orders of the AGW and attempted merely to leave and go about his business – asserted his right to liberty – he would certainly have found himself the object of murderous violence.

Murderous violence is implicit (and often, explicit) in every interaction one of us has with one of them.

Eric Peters
Eric Peters is a freelance car/bike/political columnist. He escaped the corporate-owned media Big Boys years ago. Without the censorship of the corporate tools

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *