Tuesday , February 18 2020
Home / LewRockwell / Our Worser Half

Our Worser Half

Summary:
Government is like a bad marriage you can’t get out of. An arranged bad marriage you didn’t even once upon a time think was a good idea that turned bad over time. You were forced into it – and you can’t leave it. Just ask Mr. Lincoln. So you end up doing your best to “make it work” – and are grateful for whatever small occasional concessions you can manage. They are better than nothing, as the saying goes. And yes – it could have been worse. For instance: Our Worser Half was going to force us to buy nothing but hybrids and electric cars – by jacking up the price – via fines – of any new car that didn’t average at least 46.7 MPG – which is every car that isn’t a hybrid or an EV – by the 2026 model year. This would have had a

Topics:
Eric Peters considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Pierre Lemieux writes Arguments for Compulsory Vaccination

Bruce Yandle writes Is the 'Goldilocks economy' dead or just sleeping?

Veronique De Rugy writes The Huge Difference Between Boris Johnson and Donald Trump

Donald J. Boudreaux writes There’s no app for social engineering

Government is like a bad marriage you can’t get out of. An arranged bad marriage you didn’t even once upon a time think was a good idea that turned bad over time. You were forced into it – and you can’t leave it.

Just ask Mr. Lincoln.

So you end up doing your best to “make it work” – and are grateful for whatever small occasional concessions you can manage.

They are better than nothing, as the saying goes.

And yes – it could have been worse. For instance:

Our Worser Half was going to force us to buy nothing but hybrids and electric cars – by jacking up the price – via fines – of any new car that didn’t average at least 46.7 MPG – which is every car that isn’t a hybrid or an EV – by the 2026 model year.

This would have had a seismic effect on not just the cost of cars but also the choice of cars available come 2026. Less “efficient” models would become more scarce as well as more expensive – the one inevitably resulting in the other.

Instead, the arm-twisting will apparently be relaxed – somewhat. New cars will “only” be required to average 37 MPG by 2026. Those that don’t – which is almost all of them except hybrids – will still cost more.

But a bit less than they would have otherwise.

Be grateful?

Yes, surely. In the manner of Stalin’s chicken. It is of a piece with being grateful that the county “only” increased the tax assessment on your home by 3 percent this year instead of 5.

How about zero?

Never mind.

Our Worser Half has been decreeing  MPG minimums – styled Corporate Average Fuel Efficiency standards – since the 1970s on the basis of a very strange and morally despicable argument, which is rarely – if ever – questioned.

It goes something like this:

The car companies must be forced by the government to offer what buyers are clamoring for – i.e., “fuel-efficient” cars – else they would force people to buy nothing but “gas guzzling” cars.

This is of course absurd, both historically, logically – and actually.

Eric Peters
Eric Peters is a freelance car/bike/political columnist. He escaped the corporate-owned media Big Boys years ago. Without the censorship of the corporate tools

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *