Saturday , April 17 2021
Home / No Author /Nuremberg Letter

Nuremberg Letter

Summary:
Magnus Mulliner27a Back MarketCarnforthLancashireLA5 9BZ Sir Simon StevensChief ExecutiveNational Health ServiceSkipton House80 London RoadSE1 6LH 05 Feb 2021 Ref: Nuremberg Physician Codes 1947 Dear Sir Simon Stevens, I am sure you will be fully aware of the present bias media coverage pertaining to SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19, which has been clearly shown to be no more deadly than a normal flu season. The research is showing Covid-19 has an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of 0.14%, according to the Head of the Health Emergencies Programme at the W.H.O. The Survival Rate: Age 0-19 – 99.997% Age 20-49 – 99.98% Age 50-69 – 99.95% Age 70+ – 94.6% I would like to remind you about the responsibility you have taken on as the Chief Executive of

Topics:
No Author considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

David Stockman writes Hey, DH5yaiegoZN36fDVciNyRueRGvGLRmr7L! Could You Spare Me A Dime?

Mises Institute writes The Political Economy of Fear

Mises Institute writes Can the Concept of Exploitation Be Saved?

Mises Institute writes Jeff Deist on Court Packing Chaos

Magnus Mulliner
27a Back Market
Carnforth
Lancashire
LA5 9BZ

Sir Simon Stevens
Chief Executive
National Health Service
Skipton House
80 London Road
SE1 6LH

05 Feb 2021

Ref: Nuremberg Physician Codes 1947

Dear Sir Simon Stevens,

I am sure you will be fully aware of the present bias media coverage pertaining to SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19, which has been clearly shown to be no more deadly than a normal flu season.

The research is showing Covid-19 has an Infection Fatality Rate (IFR) of 0.14%, according to the Head of the Health Emergencies Programme at the W.H.O.

The Survival Rate:

Age 0-19 – 99.997%

Age 20-49 – 99.98%

Age 50-69 – 99.95%

Age 70+ – 94.6%

I would like to remind you about the responsibility you have taken on as the Chief Executive of our NHS.

A part of me is shocked at how you have allowed a ‘flu’ virus to take down the UK economy, using lies, deceit and mimetic programmed propaganda about our NHS being overwhelmed and used as a focal emotional brainwashed leverage, to allow docile citizens to acquiesce to ‘fake’ science.

During the busiest period where it can clearly be seen that many of our NHS hospitals are designed ‘not-fit-for-purpose’ in handling the same flu challenged season, you choose to promulgate inaccurate figures, using fractionation, confusion, repetition, illusion of choice (Do you want the Oxford/AstraZeneca or the Pfizer vaccine?), scarcity (waiting YOUR turn for the vaccines!), which our bias controlled media have accentuated creating far more deaths in suicide, depression, cancers, etc.

For many weeks throughout January and indeed February our local Lancaster Hospital has been operating at 88% or less bed capacity. Normally it would be in the high 90%’s this time of year.

We could have invested millions into making our ‘pride’ NHS fit-for-purpose, instead of wasting Taxpayers money on testing, just so a Coup UK Government could continue scaring unconscious citizens to docilly conform, wearing masks (Proven useless outsider a hospital setting), standing two metres apart and self-isolate healthy individuals. None of which has ever before been done successfully in ‘controlling’ or ‘containing’ a virus, whilst creating the illusion of a ‘fatal’ virus, you create the ‘cure’ – vaccine! It’s like something out of a Hollywood Movie – Contagion.

The fact is all Covid vaccines are EXPERIMENTAL and have not undergone the usual time frames (Phase I through to Phase IV) and independent testing protocols and as a result have broken the Nuremberg Code of 1947.

No ‘Novel’ Covid Vaccine has been proven to be Independently Studied and identified as 1. Safe and 2. Effective (long term and with people already on Poly Pharmacy/Infirm or with comorbidities) and 3. You cannot even sue the manufacturer assuming you or family member was injured due to the ‘effects’ of the chemicals injected into your body.

If the above points I made are wrong, please could you kindly provide me with your evidence/science. Thank you.

Have you read this?

Covid-19: politicisation, “corruption,” and suppression of science

BMJ 2020; 371 doi (Published 13 November 2020) Cite this as: BMJ 2020;371:m4425

And were you aware of this?

Covid-19: Norway investigates 23 deaths in frail elderly patients after vaccination

BMJ 2021; 372 doi (Published 15 January 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;372:n149

I recently learned that Denmark, Norway, France and Sweden were the latest European countries not to offer the AstraZeneca vaccine to individuals over the age of 65, citing a lack of data, while Poland has said the vaccine will only be used for people aged 18-60.

Sir Simon Stevens, could you please kindly provide me with the data, which explains why we in the UK have allowed our elderly (70+) to be vaccinated? How come other countries including S. Africa have ‘chosen’ not to, due to a “…lack of data”. Thank you.

I find it interesting that if you die within 28 days of having had a ‘positive’ rt-PCR test, on your death certificate it will state “Covid”, even if you were run over by a bus or shot in the head (without any post-mortems!) and yet if a person dies within 28 days of having had the Bill & Melinda Gates’ Vaccine or Oxford AstraZeneca’s, you do not state, “Died of vaccine poisoning”, or “Vaccine related death”, etc.

As we move into the accountability and everyone’s part in this PlanDemic, under the Nuremberg Code of 1947, “Permissible Medical Experiments. The great weight of the evidence before us to effect that certain types of medical experiments on human beings, when kept within reasonably well-defined bounds, conform to the ethics of the medical profession…”

The fact that many millions of people have been consistently scared through the actions of a Coup UK Government using medical mandate interventions, has clearly overstepped the Nuremberg Code 1947, by which we all live under. There are 10 vitally important points of which four I have highlighted below.

  1. The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the subject matter involved as to enable him to make an understanding and enlightened decision.

Sir Simon Stevens, you know the above has not been followed by you and indeed all your staff when it comes to vaccinations.

  1. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical and mental suffering and injury.
  2. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
  3. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.

Further information can be obtained here and here.

I could share more of the real science showing that SARS-CoV-2/Covid-19 has NOT been isolated using the Kosh’s Postulates method (Golden Standard) and neither was SARS-CoV-1 (2002/3). And the fact that there are over 100 different types of rt-PCR tests, which were never created for ‘Medical diagnosis’ according to the creator Kary Mullis, who won a Nobel Prize in Chemistry ’93, but who unfortunately died in Aug 2019.

As one of a number of ‘Critical Thinkers’, we are bringing to account those in positions of authority that have ultimately led our country into genocide, and I don’t use that word lightly. Far more people will die due to the lockdowns and ‘tears’ system, and Covid Vaccines than from a ‘flu bug’ labelled as Covid-19/SARS-CoV-2.

The present Coup Government has not performed a Risk/Benefit Impact Assessment showing their reasons for lockdowns and Tier Systems, even after the W.H.O has stated how harmful they are. “W.H.O envoy Dr David Nabarro said such restrictive measures should only be treated as a last resort, the British magazine the Spectator reported in a video interview.

“We in the World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means of control of this virus,” Nabarro said.” See this.

I would appreciate your help in understanding what was going through your mind and your understanding about the Nuremberg Code of 1947? The reason I ask is, these above-mentioned points, when broken are known as war crimes.

I look forward to hearing back from you.

Many thanks for your understanding on this highly critical humanitarian matter.

Yours in health, sincerely

Magnus Mulliner

PP:

David Morris MP

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *