I am in Milan Malpensa and beginning a 17-hour journey back to Dallas for Thanksgiving. But deadlines loom. This afternoon I got this brief note from good friend David Rosenberg, chief econ at Gluskin Sheff, and find myself nodding firmly in agreement. Rosie throws in a quick head feint by telling us that he’s not investing around Trumponomics at all, but then he dives into a really helpful examination of what we have to do to find value in today’s overvalued world. Rosie will of course be a keynote speaker again at my conference next March 6-9 at the Manchester Grand Hyatt in San Diego, and he is always a favorite of the attendees – but then we have a long list of top-notch speakers, and SIC 2018 promises to be bigger and better than ever. I strongly
John Mauldin considers the following as important:
This could be interesting, too:
Tim Worstall writes The horrors of overpopulation and urbanisation
No Author writes Nikola Tesla Describes the Cell Phone in 1926
Yvonne Lorenzo writes Black Heart
No Author writes Hillary Is Sorry If You Misinterpreted Her
I am in Milan Malpensa and beginning a 17-hour journey back to Dallas for Thanksgiving.
But deadlines loom. This afternoon I got this brief note from good friend David Rosenberg, chief econ at Gluskin Sheff, and find myself nodding firmly in agreement. Rosie throws in a quick head feint by telling us that he’s not investing around Trumponomics at all, but then he dives into a really helpful examination of what we have to do to find value in today’s overvalued world.
Rosie will of course be a keynote speaker again at my conference next March 6-9 at the Manchester Grand Hyatt in San Diego, and he is always a favorite of the attendees – but then we have a long list of top-notch speakers, and SIC 2018 promises to be bigger and better than ever. I strongly encourage you to register early, because, as I mentioned a couple weeks back, we intend fill all the seats quickly this year and then close registration so that we can focus on making the conference a great one. You can learn more and reserve your place right here.
So this is today’s Outside the Box, and it’s maybe my shortest intro ever, as boarding time is close. I trust you will have a great Thanksgiving with family and friends.
John Mauldin, Editor
Outside the Box
"Must See" Research Directly from John Mauldin to You
Be the best-informed person in the room with your very own risk-free trial of Over My Shoulder. Join John Mauldin's private readers’ circle, today.
By David Rosenberg, Chief Economist & Strategist, Gluskin Sheff
November 22, 2017
Well, it’s hard to believe that it’s been a year since Donald Trump got elected, and at least the good news is that we’re still alive. All kidding aside, the question I’ve been fielding ever since November 8th of last year and to this day is how we are investing around Donald Trump, and the answer has not changed one iota, which is that we are not investing around Trumponomics at all.
That often raises eyebrows because we all know that the U.S. stock market indices have continued to hit new record highs almost daily, but I would claim that this has had little to do with the President. Actually, if you had owned the basket of Trump stocks the so-called experts told you to own after last year’s election, you would have woefully lagged behind.
And of course, it goes without saying that the top performing sector by a country mile, and I am talking about technology, was the area we were all supposed to avoid since Silicon Valley would pay the price for not supporting The Donald. And yet the tech universe is up 40% for the year and has nearly doubled the rest of the market. There may be some hope out there that we will see tax reform south of the border, but there are an array of other factors influencing investor sentiment right now. Ongoing supportive global liquidity growth and the vast majority of companies beating their profits and sales estimates are among the reasons.
That said, excessive valuations and the Fed now coupling its rate hikes with balance sheet reduction I think are going to produce some speed bumps for risk appetite in coming months. Between that and the tapering by the ECB and the fact that the Bank of England joined the Fed on the rate-hiking front, are all very likely going to generate a less calm and more choppy market. Though this actually would be a good thing in terms of opening up some buying opportunities, taking advantage of these opportunities will require having some dry powder on hand.
So it’s either about investing around late-cycle thematics in North America or it is about heading to other geographies that are closer to mid cycle — and that would include Europe, segments of the Emerging Market space where the fundamentals have really improved, and also primarily in Japan. These markets are not only mid cycle and as such have a longer runway for growth, but also trade relatively inexpensively in a world where value is scarce, and for the most part, still have friendly central banks keeping liquidity conditions flush.
I would have to say that if there is a market that has broken out of a 25-year secular downtrend, and where the economic and political tailwinds are significant, it is in Japan. I get told all the time that Japan’s population is declining, but we are buying companies, not bodies, and the bottom line is that even with this declining population, earnings momentum is on the rise and profit margins in Japan are on an impressive expansion phase, and not nearly priced in. In fact, Japan is one of the few markets globally that is not trading at premium multiples relative to its history and is an under-owned market both globally and locally.
Turning to Canada, there is some visibility here in the oil price given: the high degree of OPEC compliance and the strong likelihood of an extension to the output cut agreement; the drawdown in US inventories; declines in global storage; solid world demand especially from oil-hungry emerging markets; and a geopolitical risk premium coming back into the market because of the uncertainties now over the Iran deal which sits in Congress and these tensions between Iraq and the Kurds. The shape of the curve doesn’t lie and the recent move from contango to backwardation is an added sign of how tight the crude market has become. The beauty here is that the Canadian E&P stocks are not priced for where oil is today, and over the near term there is more upside potential than downside risk. So they look attractively priced here, once again in a world where inexpensive assets are in short supply. And given the correlations between energy and the Canadian banks, this is good news for this sector as well.
It also seems to me that with the Bank of Canada now on hold and with the Fed likely to raise rates, that there are increased odds of the Canadian dollar faltering further. And if it breaks C$1.30 which is the 200-day moving average, then we are talking about the next test being C$1.35 where there is a ton of technical support.
And let’s face it, the economy here is going to need another dose of some currency-related stimulus because of the combination of NAFTA uncertainty, the tightened B20 mortgage regulations (which is sure to bite into the housing market next year), and a clouded fiscal picture in terms of the outlook for taxation (I have no clue as to why the Federal government is adding more complexity to this situation, but it is just another reason for the Bank of Canada to stay on the sidelines).
In any event, the resultant weakening in the loonie is a positive underpinning for many of our sectors, and again, that includes energy where the Western Canada Select price has surged in local currency terms by just under 20% over the past two months whereas the TSX energy sector has rebounded by 7%. I should add that there are a host of other Canadian companies in our portfolio that have U.S. dollar revenue streams in areas like real estate, banks, insurers and forest products, that are going to benefit from this renewed period of Canadian dollar weakness.