Friday , January 24 2020
Home / Mercatus Center / Incompatible Institutions: Socialism versus Constitutionalism in India

Incompatible Institutions: Socialism versus Constitutionalism in India

Summary:
Publication There has been a decline in rule of law in India, reflected in the frequent amendments to the Indian Constitution. This paper analyzes the historical, ideological, and economic context for constitutional amendments to understand the reason for the deterioration of constitutionalism in India. I argue that the formal institutions of socialist planning were fundamentally incompatible with the constraints imposed by the Indian Constitution. This incompatibility led to frequent amendments to the Constitution, especially in the area of Fundamental Rights. Consequently, pursuit of socialist policies gradually undermined the Constitution. The contradictory mixture of socialism and constitutionalism led to economic and political deprivations that were never intended by the framers. I demonstrate this incompatibility using evidence from five-year-plans and constitutional amendments in India.Find the article at Springer Link.

Topics:
Shruti Rajagopalan considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Paul Gottfried writes Neil McCaffrey and the Conservative Book Club

David Stockman writes Davos Man – Misbegotten Progeny of Keynesian Central Bankers

Joseph Mercola writes More Studies Show Fluoride Affects the Brain and Disrupts Sleep

Paul Craig Roberts writes A Failed Impeachment Still Serves Dems

There has been a decline in rule of law in India, reflected in the frequent amendments to the Indian Constitution. This paper analyzes the historical, ideological, and economic context for constitutional amendments to understand the reason for the deterioration of constitutionalism in India. I argue that the formal institutions of socialist planning were fundamentally incompatible with the constraints imposed by the Indian Constitution. This incompatibility led to frequent amendments to the Constitution, especially in the area of Fundamental Rights. Consequently, pursuit of socialist policies gradually undermined the Constitution. The contradictory mixture of socialism and constitutionalism led to economic and political deprivations that were never intended by the framers. I demonstrate this incompatibility using evidence from five-year-plans and constitutional amendments in India.

Find the article at Springer Link.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *