Monday , July 13 2020
Home / Peter J. Boettke, Scott King /Democracy by Discussion, Not Debate

Democracy by Discussion, Not Debate

Summary:
Freedom of inquiry remains one of the core tenants of the liberal project. However, in a 1960 letter, James M. Buchanan argued that free inquiry was important for more than just philosophical reasons. In fact, freedom of inquiry and the ability to participate in collective choice processes was at the heart of Buchanan’s methodological commitments to social science and foundational to the entire project of Virginia Political Economy. In this paper, we will show why freedom of inquiry assumes the central place that it holds in Buchanan’s methodology and research more broadly. Insisting on inquiry being open and free to all was not simply an ideological preference held by Buchanan—rather, to him it was the only way forward for Virginia Political Economy.

Topics:
Peter J. Boettke, Scott King considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Tyler Durden writes Harper’s “Bizarre” Letter & The Woke Revolution

Tyler Durden writes Graham Asks Mueller To Testify Before Senate After WaPo Editorial Slamming Stone Commutation

Tyler Durden writes American Collusion: Weaponizing Media, Big-Tech, & Government

Tyler Durden writes ‘People Are Going To Be Shocked’: Bannon Claims Wuhan Lab Employees Have Defected, Are Working With FBI

Freedom of inquiry remains one of the core tenants of the liberal project. However, in a 1960 letter, James M. Buchanan argued that free inquiry was important for more than just philosophical reasons. In fact, freedom of inquiry and the ability to participate in collective choice processes was at the heart of Buchanan’s methodological commitments to social science and foundational to the entire project of Virginia Political Economy. In this paper, we will show why freedom of inquiry assumes the central place that it holds in Buchanan’s methodology and research more broadly. Insisting on inquiry being open and free to all was not simply an ideological preference held by Buchanan—rather, to him it was the only way forward for Virginia Political Economy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *