Wednesday , January 20 2021
Home / Richard Wagner /Who Was James M. Buchanan and Why Is He Significant?

Who Was James M. Buchanan and Why Is He Significant?

Summary:
This essay introduces a collection of 49 essays that exemplify the breadth and the depth of James M. Buchanan’s (1919–2013) contributions to economics in the post-war period. Buchanan started his career in 1948 as someone who wanted to provide a different scholarly framework for a theory of public finance and managed to do so. What resulted was a scholarly output that was published in 20 volumes in 2002, to which he continued to add until his death. The essays in this volume reflect the breadth and depth of Buchanan’s contributions to political economy and social philosophy. While these essays are written by people who admired and learned from Buchanan’s work, these are not essays in hagiography. They explore various questions and topics that interested Buchanan. A good number of these

Topics:
Richard Wagner considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Tyler Durden writes CIA Director Gina Haspel Announces Resignation A Day Before Biden Enters Office

Tyler Durden writes Yellen’s Opening Salvo Shows No Let Up In Tensions

Tyler Durden writes “It’s Killing Younger People” – New COVID Strain Reportedly Emerging Within Brazilian Amazon

Tyler Durden writes Media Cheers DC Under Military Occupation

This essay introduces a collection of 49 essays that exemplify the breadth and the depth of James M. Buchanan’s (1919–2013) contributions to economics in the post-war period. Buchanan started his career in 1948 as someone who wanted to provide a different scholarly framework for a theory of public finance and managed to do so. What resulted was a scholarly output that was published in 20 volumes in 2002, to which he continued to add until his death. The essays in this volume reflect the breadth and depth of Buchanan’s contributions to political economy and social philosophy. While these essays are written by people who admired and learned from Buchanan’s work, these are not essays in hagiography. They explore various questions and topics that interested Buchanan. A good number of these explorations have critical overtones, but most significantly they build upon lines of inquiry that animated Buchanan’s scholarly curiosity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *