Sunday , October 22 2017
Home / Mises institute Canada / The true reason for the EU’s call to beef up financial regulation

The true reason for the EU’s call to beef up financial regulation

Summary:
From today’s Open Europe news summary: European Commission considers beefing-up powers of pan-EU financial supervisors The Financial Times reports that the European Commission is considering plans to beef-up the powers of the three pan-EU financial supervisors, in a bid to address potential supervisory loopholes ahead of Brexit. Valdis Dombrovskis, a vice-president of the Commission, is quoted as saying, “Already you hear there are some disagreements among [EU] member states whether or not some kind of regulatory arbitrage is taking place, so indeed it strengthens the need of the case for regulatory convergence.” The article notes that one of the options under consideration would see the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) been given powers to directly supervise clearing houses, as well as greater oversight over cross-border investment funds. Source: The Financial Times  Let’s all consider the true meaning of the Commission’s goals by examining these phrases: “potential supervisory loopholes” “regulatory arbitrage” “the need for regulatory convergence” The EU is terrified that Brexit will mean that it is losing its stranglehold on ever increasing financial regulation.

Topics:
Patrick Barron considers the following as important:

This could be interesting, too:

Ash Navabi writes For Restaurants, Sweeping the Floor is Equivalent to Cooking Great Food

Doug French writes Shooting War in North Korea? History says Yes.

The_Real_Fly writes Who Made Dennis Gartman “The Commodities King?”

Caleb Mcmillan writes Bank of Canada Raises Interest Rates… Again

From today’s Open Europe news summary:

European Commission considers beefing-up powers of pan-EU financial supervisors

The Financial Times reports that the European Commission is considering plans to beef-up the powers of the three pan-EU financial supervisors, in a bid to address potential supervisory loopholes ahead of Brexit. Valdis Dombrovskis, a vice-president of the Commission, is quoted as saying, “Already you hear there are some disagreements among [EU] member states whether or not some kind of regulatory arbitrage is taking place, so indeed it strengthens the need of the case for regulatory convergence.” The article notes that one of the options under consideration would see the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) been given powers to directly supervise clearing houses, as well as greater oversight over cross-border investment funds.

Source: The Financial Times 

Let’s all consider the true meaning of the Commission’s goals by examining these phrases:

“potential supervisory loopholes”

“regulatory arbitrage”

“the need for regulatory convergence”

The EU is terrified that Brexit will mean that it is losing its stranglehold on ever increasing financial regulation.

Patrick Barron
Patrick Barron is a private consultant to the banking industry. He has taught an introductory course in Austrian economics for several years at the University of Iowa. He has also taught at the Graduate School of Banking at the University of Wisconsin for over twenty-five years, and has delivered many presentations at the European Parliament.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *